So, I've been looking at the following: - EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS - EF 24-70mm f/2.8 L . I'd envisage bringing both the 10-22mm and whichever new lens I buy on my trips, so the longer range of the 24-70mm and the fact that it doesn't overlap makes it seem ideal, but the IS on the 17-55mm is appealing. I mostly shoot scenery, from narrow old town
Re: Canon 24-70mm f/2.8 L USM II VS Canon EF 24–105mm f/4L IS II. I have all three lenses mentioned and I would suggest either the 24-70mm f/2.8 L USM II or a combo of the Canon EF 24–105mm f/4L IS II and the EF 35mm f/1.4 II.
The Canon EF 24-70mm f2.8 IS USM is a smaller, lighter, lower cost alternative to the 24-70/2.8L II USM with the added benefit of image stabilization. Canon have a number of f4L lens alternatives to their faster f2.8L lenses, including the 17-40/4L and the 70-200/4L models. The EF 24-70/4L IS USM is the latest addition to this f4 lineup.
In the Canon EF 70-200mm f/4L IS II vs. 70-200mm f/2.8L IS III USM Lens specifications comparison, we find the f/4L IS II with a shorter minimum focus distance (39.37 vs. 47.24" / 1000mm vs. 1200mm) for a higher maximum magnification (0.27x vs. 0.21x). The f/4L IS II has a higher-rated image stabilization system (5 stops vs. 3.5) and it also
Ns2Z.
  • oirg935w7g.pages.dev/48
  • oirg935w7g.pages.dev/2
  • oirg935w7g.pages.dev/84
  • oirg935w7g.pages.dev/200
  • oirg935w7g.pages.dev/6
  • oirg935w7g.pages.dev/339
  • oirg935w7g.pages.dev/115
  • oirg935w7g.pages.dev/197
  • oirg935w7g.pages.dev/21

    • canon ef 24 70mm f 4l is usm vs 24 105 ii